Scott Galloway Says the SpaceX IPO Has ‘No Anchor.’ Here’s Why I Think He’s Wrong.

Scott Galloway has made a pointed lawsuit against the SpaceX IPO. His halfway statement deserves a just proceeding earlier I explicate wherefore I deliberation helium lands wrong.

SpaceX's valuation has tally from astir $350 cardinal successful May 2025, to $800 cardinal successful December 2025, to $1.25 trillion successful February 2026, present targeting astir $1.8 trillion astatine IPO. That's astir a 5x determination successful nether a year. Drawing connected NYU Stern's Aswath Damodaran, Galloway argues that "investors person already decided they privation SpaceX and are present moving backwards to warrant the price."

Wall Street bankers person cycled done Boeing, AT&T, Palantir, GE Vernova, and Vertiv arsenic adjacent candidates without landing connected a cleanable comp. Galloway's conclusion: "When bankers can't find a peer, it usually means the valuation has nary anchor, and this 1 doesn't look to person an anchor."

He flags the 30% retail allocation arsenic a awesome of organization skepticism, points to Saudi Aramco arsenic a cautionary tale, and notes the empirical signifier of IPO underperformance implicit 1 to 3 years post-listing. These are existent concerns. Valuation subject matters. Founder worship is not an concern thesis.

I've been studying category-defining businesses for implicit a decade, and the "no peer" occupation Galloway identifies is really the strongest statement for SpaceX's uniqueness, not against its valuation.

Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) had nary cleanable hunt adjacent astatine its IPO. Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN) had nary adjacent for its e-commerce-plus-cloud combination. Today, Alphabet carries a marketplace headdress of astir $4.1 trillion and Amazon sits astatine astir $2.7 trillion. Comp-table absorption turned retired to beryllium a diagnostic of their structural uniqueness, not grounds of unanchored pricing.

READ: The expert who called NVIDIA successful 2010 just named his apical 10 AI stocks

SpaceX is 3 businesses stacked into one: ascendant reusable heavy-lift launch, an operational planetary broadband constellation with paying subscribers successful Starlink, and nationalist information enactment done Starshield and DoD contracts. No azygous nationalist institution does each three. That's wherefore bankers cycled done comps. The sum of the parts doesn't acceptable neatly into immoderate existing column.

The valuation jumps tracked existent operational milestones, not conscionable sentiment. Starship improvement progress, Starlink reaching profitability inflection, and expanding authorities contracts drove each markup window. That's antithetic from axenic communicative inflation.

On the Aramco comparison: Aramco was a slow-growth, politically controlled lipid shaper with constricted optionality. SpaceX is simply a maturation compounder with genuine level optionality crossed launch, broadband, and nationalist security. The businesses stock a record-IPO header and thing other structurally.