Reuters
Tue, February 17, 2026 astatine 5:47 AM CST 1 min read
LONDON, Feb 17 (Reuters) - Qualcomm connected Tuesday said a London suit alleging it had abused its ascendant presumption to unit Apple and Samsung to wage inflated royalties volition beryllium withdrawn.
The British consumers' relation called Which? had brought the lawsuit on behalf of astir 29 cardinal radical who bought iPhones oregon Samsung devices since 2015.
Which? had said consumers were entitled to up to 480 cardinal pounds ($652.03 million) successful compensation, with its arguing astatine a trial past twelvemonth that Qualcomm made Apple and Samsung wage inflated royalties adjacent if its chips are not utilized successful a instrumentality nether a worldwide alleged nary licence, nary chips policy.
Qualcomm, however, said the suit mischaracterised its long-standing request for manufacturers to get a licence for its modular essential patents earlier buying chipsets.
Before the Competition Appeal Tribunal could regularisation pursuing past year's trial, Which? said successful a connection that it would use to retreat the lawsuit having reached an statement nether which Qualcomm volition marque nary outgo to the claimant class.
Which? said that it had concluded Qualcomm's practices "did not infringe contention laws, did not effect successful inflated royalties, and did not pb to an increase successful prices consumers paid for their mobile phones".
A Qualcomm spokesperson said: "This designation by the people representative, pursuing a proceedings connected the merits, reaffirms what the courts in the United States person repeatedly held: Qualcomm's licensing practices are lawful and bash not harm competition."
($1 = 0.7362 pounds)
(Reporting by Sam Tobin; editing by Catarina Demony)

4 weeks ago
10






English (CA) ·
English (US) ·
Spanish (MX) ·