They intuited that molecules adjacent the aboveground behave otherwise from those heavy wrong the ice. Ice is simply a crystal, which means each h2o molecule is locked into a periodic lattice. However, astatine the surface, the h2o molecules person less neighbors to enslaved with and truthful person much state of question than successful coagulated ice. In that alleged premelted layer, molecules are easy displaced by a skate, a skis oregon a shoe.
Today, scientists mostly hold that the premelted furniture exists, astatine slightest adjacent to the melting point, but they disagree connected its relation successful ice’s slipperiness.
A fewer years ago, Luis MacDowell, a physicist astatine the Complutense University of Madrid, and his collaborators ran a bid of simulations to found which of the 3 hypotheses—pressure, friction oregon premelting—best explains the slipperiness of ice. “In machine simulations, you tin spot the atoms move,” helium said—something that isn’t feasible successful existent experiments. “And you tin really look astatine the neighbors of those atoms” to spot whether they are periodically spaced, similar successful a solid, oregon disordered, similar successful a liquid.
They observed that their simulated artifact of crystal was so coated with a liquidlike furniture conscionable a fewer molecules thick, arsenic the premelting mentation predicts. When they simulated a dense entity sliding connected the ice’s surface, the furniture thickened, successful statement with the unit theory. Finally, they explored frictional heating. Near ice’s melting point, the premelted furniture was already thick, truthful frictional heating didn’t importantly interaction it. At little temperatures, however, the sliding entity produced vigor that melted the crystal and thickened the layer.
“Our connection is: All 3 arguable hypotheses run simultaneously to 1 oregon the different degree,” MacDowell said.
Hypothesis 4: Amorphization
Or possibly the melting of the aboveground isn’t the main origin of ice’s slipperiness.
Recently, a squad of researchers astatine Saarland University successful Germany identified arguments against each 3 prevailing theories. First, for unit to beryllium precocious capable to melt ice’s surface, the country of interaction betwixt (say) skis and crystal would person to beryllium “unreasonably small,” they wrote. Second, for a skis moving astatine a realistic speed, experiments amusement that the magnitude of vigor generated by friction is insufficient to origin melting. Third, they recovered that successful highly acold temperatures, crystal is inactive slippery adjacent though there’s nary premelted layer. (Surface molecules inactive person a dearth of neighbors, but astatine debased temperatures they don’t person capable vigor to flooded the beardown bonds with coagulated crystal molecules.) “So either the slipperiness of crystal is coming from a operation of each of them oregon a fewer of them, oregon determination is thing other that we don’t cognize yet,” said Achraf Atila, a materials idiosyncratic connected the team.
Materials scientists astatine Saarland University successful Germany showed successful machine simulations that arsenic 2 blocks of crystal descent against each other, an amorphous furniture successful the mediate gradually thickens.
The scientists looked for alternate explanations successful probe connected different substances, specified arsenic diamonds. Gemstone polishers person agelong known from acquisition that immoderate sides of a diamond are easier to polish, oregon “softer,” than others. In 2011, different German probe radical published a insubstantial explaining this phenomenon. They created machine simulations of 2 diamonds sliding against each other. Atoms connected the aboveground were mechanically pulled retired of their bonds, which allowed them to move, signifier caller bonds, and truthful on. This sliding formed a structureless, “amorphous” layer. In opposition to the crystal quality of the diamond, this furniture is disordered and behaves much similar a liquid than a solid. This amorphization effect depends connected the predisposition of molecules astatine the surface, truthful immoderate sides of a crystal are softer than others.
Atila and his colleagues reason that a akin mechanics happens successful ice. They simulated crystal surfaces sliding against each other, keeping the somesthesia of the simulated strategy debased capable to guarantee the lack of melting. (Any slipperiness would truthful person a antithetic explanation.) Initially, the surfaces attracted each other, overmuch similar magnets. This was due to the fact that h2o molecules are dipoles, with uneven concentrations of affirmative and antagonistic charge. The affirmative extremity of 1 molecule attracts the antagonistic extremity of another. The attraction successful the crystal created tiny welds betwixt the sliding surfaces. As the surfaces slid past each other, the welds broke isolated and caller ones formed, gradually changing the ice’s structure.











English (CA) ·
English (US) ·
Spanish (MX) ·