ISCV vs. IWN: ISCV Offers Lower Costs But IWN Provides Greater Liquidity

1 day ago 3

Jake Lerch, The Motley Fool

Sat, January 10, 2026 astatine 12:42 PM CST 5 min read

IWN charges a higher disbursal ratio and yields somewhat little than ISCV
IWN has delivered a stronger 1-year full instrumentality but experienced a deeper five-year drawdown
IWN holds much stocks and tilts much toward existent estate, portion ISCV has greater vulnerability to user cyclicals
These 10 stocks could mint the adjacent question of millionaires ›

The iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (NYSEMKT:IWN) charges 4 times the disbursal ratio of the iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Value ETF (NYSEMKT:ISCV), but offers broader holdings, higher caller returns, and a humble tilt toward existent property implicit consumer-focused sectors.

Both the iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Value ETF (ISCV) and the iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) way U.S. small-cap worth stocks, aiming to seizure companies trading astatine little prices comparative to fundamentals. This examination focuses connected their costs, performance, liquidity, and portfolio constitution to assistance clarify which fund’s attack whitethorn appeal, depending connected idiosyncratic priorities.

Metric

ISCV

IWN

Issuer	iShares	iShares
Expense ratio	0.06%	0.24%
1-yr instrumentality (as of 2026-01-05)	11.9%	13.8%
Dividend yield	2.0%	1.7%
AUM	$586.9 million	$12.4 billion

ISCV is much affordable, charging conscionable 0.06% successful yearly fees compared to IWN’s 0.24%, and besides delivers a somewhat higher yield, which whitethorn entreaty to cost-conscious, oregon income-focused, investors.

Metric

ISCV

IWN

Max drawdown (5 y)	-25.35%	-26.71%
Growth of $1,000 implicit 5 years	$1,657	$1,534

IWN tracks a Russell scale of small-cap U.S. stocks with worth characteristics, holding 1,407 securities arsenic of its 25.4-year history. Its assemblage allocation leans astir heavy connected fiscal services (26%), existent property (12%), and industrials (11%), with apical holdings including Blk Csh Fnd Treasury Sl Agency (XTSLA) 0.99%, Echostar (NASDAQ:SATS) 0.98%, and Hecla Mining (NYSE:HL) 0.61%.

ISCV besides focuses connected U.S. small-cap value, but with a somewhat antithetic assemblage mix: fiscal services (21%), user cyclical (16%), and industrials (13%). Among its 1,101 holdings, apical positions are Sandisk (NASDAQ:SNDK) 0.93%, Blk Csh Fnd Treasury Sl Agency (XTSLA) 0.89%, and Rocket Companies (NYSE:RKT) 0.60%. Neither money introduces leverage, ESG, oregon different structural quirks.

For much guidance connected ETF investing, cheque retired the afloat usher astatine this link.

Both of these funds stock galore akin characteristics, however, determination are immoderate cardinal differences investors should consider.

For example, portion some funds people small-cap stocks, determination are differences successful their holdings. IWN leans much heavy connected the fiscal sector, with 26% of its wide holdings successful that industry. ISCV, by comparison, has lone 21% of its full holdings successful the fiscal sector.