IJJ vs. VBR: Should Value Investors Choose Mid-Cap Stability or Small-Cap Growth Potential?

2 hours ago 1

Sara Appino, The Motley Fool

Sat, December 27, 2025 astatine 7:47 AM CST 5 min read

  • VBR charges a overmuch little disbursal ratio and holds a broader handbasket of small-cap worth stocks.

  • IJJ is overmuch smaller successful standard and has a tilt toward mid-cap financials.

  • Both funds person seen humble 1-year returns, but VBR shows a marginally deeper 5-year drawdown.

  • These 10 stocks could mint the adjacent question of millionaires ›

The iShares SP Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (NYSEMKT:IJJ) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (NYSEMKT:VBR) disagree astir successful cost, size, and portfolio breadth -- with VBR offering overmuch little fees and astir triple the holdings, portion IJJ provides a mid-cap focus.

These 2 value-oriented exchange-traded funds purpose to seizure U.S. stocks trading beneath their estimated worth, but with antithetic approaches: IJJ targets mid-cap companies with worth characteristics, portion VBR tracks a broader small-cap worth index. Here’s however they stack up connected cost, performance, risk, and what’s inside.

Metric

IJJ

VBR

Issuer

IShares

Vanguard

Expense ratio

0.18%

0.07%

1-yr instrumentality (as of Dec. 23, 2025)

7.6%

8.06%

Dividend yield

1.66%

1.97%

Beta

1.14

1.12

AUM

$8.0 billion

$59.6 billion

Beta measures terms volatility comparative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year play returns. The 1-yr instrumentality represents full instrumentality implicit the trailing 12 months.

VBR stands retired arsenic the much affordable prime with a 0.07% disbursal ratio, compared to IJJ’s 0.18%.

Metric

IJJ

VBR

Max drawdown (5 y)

-22.68%

-24.19%

Growth of $1,000 implicit 5 years

$1,537

$1,502

VBR holds a sweeping portfolio of 840 stocks, focusing connected U.S. small-cap companies that conscionable worth criteria. The fund’s largest assemblage exposures are industrials (19%), fiscal services (18%), and user cyclicals (13%). Its apical holdings, including NRG Energy (NYSE:NRG), Sandisk (NASDAQ:SNDK), and EMCOR Group (NYSE:EME), each marque up little than 1% of assets, signaling wide diversification. With 21.9 years successful cognition and $59.6 cardinal successful assets nether absorption (AUM), VBR’s standard and index-tracking attack whitethorn entreaty to investors seeking wide marketplace sum astatine a debased cost.

IJJ, by contrast, concentrates connected mid-cap worth stocks, with the heaviest weights successful fiscal services (19%), industrials (15%), and user cyclicals (12%). IJJ’s 309 holdings make a much focused portfolio, perchance starring to antithetic hazard and instrumentality characteristics versus VBR’s broader, small-cap emphasis.

For much guidance connected ETF investing, cheque retired the afloat usher astatine this link.

IJJ and VBR some people undervalued American companies, but IJJ focuses connected mid-caps portion VBR goes smaller, creating fundamentally antithetic risk-return profiles for investors. The outgo quality is substantial. VBR charges conscionable 0.07% annually compared to IJJ's 0.18% disbursal ratio, meaning Vanguard's money costs little than fractional arsenic overmuch to own. Additionally, VBR dominates successful standard with astir $59.6 cardinal successful assets versus IJJ's $8 billion, reflecting its popularity among worth investors.


Read Entire Article