Both the Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF (NASDAQ:VGIT) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (NASDAQ:BND) are fashionable enslaved ETFs from Vanguard that purpose to supply dependable income, but their approaches disagree erstwhile it comes to the people of bonds. This examination examines their costs, yields, performance, risk, and portfolio constitution to assistance investors determine which mightiness acceptable their needs.
| Issuer | Vanguard | Vanguard |
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.03% |
| 1-yr instrumentality (as of Feb. 8, 2026) | 2.53% | 2.19% |
| Dividend yield | 3.79% | 3.86% |
| AUM | $39.17 billion | $389.22 billion |
Beta measures terms volatility comparative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year play returns. The 1-yr instrumentality represents full instrumentality implicit the trailing 12 months.
Both funds are arsenic affordable with a 0.03% disbursal ratio. However, BND’s output edges retired VGIT’s, portion VGIT presently has a somewhat higher one-year return.
| Max drawdown (5 y) | -15.04% | -17.93% |
| Growth of $1,000 implicit 5 years | $867 | $850 |
For astir 20 years, BND has tracked the wide U.S. investment-grade enslaved market, holding a ample handbasket of 15,000 securities. It is designed for investors seeking balanced vulnerability crossed Treasuries, mortgage-backed securities, and investment-grade corporates.
By contrast, VGIT invests chiefly successful intermediate-term U.S. Treasury securities, with 104 holdings and a beardown authorities enslaved presence. All of its enslaved holdings are AAA-rated, the highest standing a U.S. enslaved tin receive.
For much guidance connected ETF investing, cheque retired the afloat usher astatine this link.
With akin show passim the years, deciding betwixt these 2 would travel down to however overmuch enslaved vulnerability and hazard investors d.
Even though astir 72% of BND’s holdings are AAA bonds, it holds astatine slightest 12% of some A and BBB bonds, and lone fractional of the bonds are backed by the U.S. government. So determination volition beryllium somewhat much risk, due to the fact that arsenic enslaved ratings decline, the issuer’s default hazard increases. However, output and instrumentality are expected to beryllium higher with lower-rated bonds due to the fact that of the hazard that comes with them.
When it comes to the enslaved marketplace overall, expect little dividend yields and returns compared to the banal marketplace and ETFs that clasp stocks, arsenic bonds aren’t arsenic volatile.
Bonds are often much straight tied to the U.S. economy, arsenic galore of them are issued by the section and national government, truthful if the U.S. system isn’t performing well, there’s a sizeable accidental bonds won’t execute arsenic good either, particularly if the authorities raises involvement rates.

3 weeks ago
12





English (CA) ·
English (US) ·
Spanish (MX) ·