The iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (NYSEMKT:SLVP) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (NYSEMKT:GDX) some way planetary mining, but SLVP leans toward metallic exposure, portion GDX is simply a overmuch larger gold-focused heavyweight.
This examination looks astatine cardinal differences successful cost, performance, risk, and portfolio constitution to assistance investors determine which whitethorn amended suit their objectives.
| Issuer | iShares | VanEck |
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.51% |
| 1-yr instrumentality (as of April 2, 2026) | 150.6% | 108.2% |
| Dividend yield | 1.3% | 0.6% |
| Beta | 0.98 | 0.66 |
| AUM | $1.4 billion | $36.5 billion |
Beta measures terms volatility comparative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year monthly returns. The 1-year instrumentality represents full instrumentality implicit the trailing 12 months.
SLVP has a little disbursal ratio and besides offers a higher dividend yield. GDX has a little beta, meaning that its terms swings thin to beryllium little volatile than SLVP’s.
| Max drawdown (5 y) | -56.18% | -49.79% |
| Growth of $1,000 implicit 5 years | $2,536 | $3,016 |
GDX holds 57 stocks and exclusively targets companies progressive successful golden mining, tracking the MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. Its largest positions are Agnico Eagle Mines (TSX:AEM), Newmont Corp. (NYSE:NEM), and Barrick Mining (TSX:ABX). As the largest ETF successful its category, GDX provides 100% focused entree to planetary golden miners and boasts important assets nether management.
SLVP, by contrast, is tilted toward metallic miners, with 36 holdings. The money provides “exposure to companies that deduce the bulk of their revenues from metallic exploration oregon metals mining.” Its apical 3 holdings are Hecla Mining (NYSE:HL), Fresnillo (LSE:FRES), and Industrias Penoles (OTC:IPOAF) -- which unneurotic marque up much than 34% of the portfolio. With its smaller fig of holdings, investors successful SLVP investors volition spot a larger fig of much concentrated bets connected metallic companies, whereas GDX spreads its vulnerability among a broader acceptable of golden producers.
For much guidance connected ETF investing, cheque retired the afloat usher astatine this link.
For retail investors trying to adhd precious metals vulnerability to a portfolio, the prime betwixt GDX and SLVP isn't conscionable astir golden versus metallic -- it's besides a question of however overmuch hazard and attraction you're comfy with.
Gold has historically been viewed arsenic a safe-haven asset, and GDX is 1 of the astir accessible ways to ain a portion of the planetary golden mining industry. For investors who prioritize comparative stableness and a well-established way record, GDX is the much straightforward choice.

2 hours ago
1





English (CA) ·
English (US) ·
Spanish (MX) ·